New Delhi, Nov 9 : One of the five judges on the Supreme Court's Ayodhya bench has offered a different perspective on the question of birth of Lord Ram.
However, the judgement does not name the judge, but his observation has included as addendum. The judge felt Hindu's faith is important.
"...the conclusion that faith and belief of Hindus since prior to construction of mosque and subsequent thereto has always been that Janmasthan of Lord Ram is the place where Babri Mosque has been constructed which faith and belief is proved by documentary and oral evidence discussed...," the judge concluded.
This judge observed that evidence on record clearly establishes that the Hindus' faith and belief that the mosque was constructed at the birth place of Lord Ram, and the three-dome structure was the birth place of the deity.
The fact that Hindus were, by constructing iron wall dividing the mosque premises, kept outside the three-dome structure cannot be said to alter their faith and belief regarding the birth place of Lord Ram.
"The worship on the Ram Chabutra in the outer courtyard was symbolic worship of Lord Ram who was believed to be born in the premises," said the judge.
The judge observed that it was only during the British period that a grille was constructed dividing the walled premises of the mosque into an inner courtyard and outer courtyard.
"Grilled iron wall was constructed to keep Hindus outside the grilled iron wall in the outer courtyard.
In view of the construction of the iron wall, the worship and puja started in Ram Chabutra in the outer courtyard.
Suit of 1885 was filed seeking permission to construct temple on the said Chabutra where worship was permitted by the British Authority," said the judge.
(Sumit Saxena can be contacted at sumit.s@ians.in)
--IANS
ss/vd.
Source: IANS
